🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.