🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions about that remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports often encourage nationalism. Some disappointment was appropriate. Rather, he invoked the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But really. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, who he has never defeated in an official match. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it presented the chance to defeat the top three competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that is as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful strength on each forehand and backhand are more than enough to defeat the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, however, he is often overmatched. The last several seasons has seen the curious rise of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of much shorter players. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty severe restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, improbable advancements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of US male players lifting major titles when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's play in that exact last eight match should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a couple match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to expend far too much effort to prevail. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest twice on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly compelling proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of the Serbian, who lost to Alcaraz in the following match and never especially appeared like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than almost anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only express his emotions or the strategy he felt determined a contest, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told a journalist in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {